EDITORIAL NOTE: The original Letter to the Editor prepared by Jones et al was based on the initial electronic version then contained several important procedural errors that resulted in erroneous conclusions as noted by Jones et al in their original Letter. Subsequently, the authors of the Letter to the Editor were notified of the corrections and they then prepared the revised Letter to the Editor published here. Jones et al did note a remaining error in Table 5 of their corrected manuscript. Based on Jones et al's observation, Lenoir et al were notified of an error on Table 5 and have addressed this in the current version of their paper published in this issue. We appreciate the input of the authors of the letter and the positive response of the author(s) of this article. Dennis C. Turk, PhD Editor-in-Chief OBJECTIVE:: Acupuncture is a common modality in the therapy of musculoskeletal disorders. The evidence for acupuncture has been examined frequently, but a clear synthesis of previous research is currently lacking. This meta-analysis aimed to summarize the evidence for nonimmediate effects of acupuncture on pain, functionality, and quality of life in patients with musculoskeletal disorders, when compared with sham acupuncture.
METHODS: Search results from PubMed and Web of Science were brought together. All screening procedures were executed twice by 2 independent researchers. The pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) with its confidence interval (CI) was estimated at follow-up at <1 month, 1 to 3 months, 3 to 6 months, and >6 months.
RESULTS: For pain, the SMD equalled respectively -0.47 (CI -0.76 to -0.19), -0.27 (CI -0.44 to -0.11), -0.32 (CI -0.51 to -0.13) and -0.12 (CI -0.36 to 0.11) for <1 month, 1 to 3 months, 3 to 6 months, and >6 months follow-up. For functionality, the pooled SMD equalled -0.43 (CI -0.76 to -0.10), -0.41 (CI -0.76 to -0.05), 0.07 (CI -0.22 to 0.36), and -0.13 (-0.46 to 0.19). In the area of QOL, pooled SMD of respectively 0.20 (CI 0.04 to 0.35), 0.19 (CI -0.01 to 0.39), 0.02 (CI -0.09 to 0.14) and -0.04 (CI -0.25 to 0.16) were obtained.
DISCUSSION: A significant difference in therapy effect, favoring acupuncture, was found for pain at <1 month, 1 to 3 months, and 3 to 6 months, as well as on quality of life at <1 month, and on functionality at <1 month and 1 to 3 months.
|Rehab Clinician (OT/PT)|
A lack of blinded therapy application in the patients is important for the analysis. Unawareness of previous treatment groups is needed for more reliable results. This is seen, for example, in surgery studies where randomized trials showed the impossibility of blinding by the medical care provider. However, it could be done at the patient level. So, it is an important point to consider. The studies analyzed provide insight on acupuncture therapy in terms of pain relief, functionality, quality of life, stress relief or other outcomes. The paper makes a strong recommendation of this kind of therapy alternative as potential treatment for ailments.
As a neurologist, I would have expected these results. The benefit of this article to me is that it provides evidence when I am asked to give an opinion or advice to my colleagues.
This is a complex meta-analysis of 21 articles which demonstrated that acupuncture compared to sham procedures decreased pain for about 6 months, improved function for about 3 months, and improved quality of life for about 1 month.
As a Physical Therapist, I find this article newsworthy. I do use acupressure frequently during manual therapy treatments. I do not practice Acupuncture or Dry Needling but this article is informative. Having read this article, I can give informed advice to patients inquiring about other treatments for their Musculoskeletal Disorder and pain.