Comparison of CPG's for the diagnosis, prognosis and management of non-specific neck pain: a systematic review

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Feb 14;20(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2441-3.

Abstract

Background: Neck pain (NP) is a very common musculoskeletal condition with potential for a high burden in disability and length of disorder. Clinical practice guidelines (CPG) give recommendations to clinicians for providing optimal care for patients however best practice recommendations are often contradictory. The purpose for this review was to conduct a SR of CPGs to assess the management recommendations for NP (diagnosis, treatment, prognosis, imaging).

Methods: Standard SR methodology was employed including a grey literature search (including the National Guideline Clearing House). Medline, Cinahl, Embase, ILC, Cochrane, Central, and Lilacs were searched from 1995-to March 2018. Two raters evaluated all citations and a third rater resolved any disagreements. The AGREE II was used to assess risk of bias of each CPG. Data was extracted and included CPG purpose, type of NP problem and clinical recommendations. The AGREE II critical appraisal tool was used to assess risk of bias of each CPG.

Results: From 640 articles, 241 were available for screening. A total of 46 guidelines were selected. CPG's were categorized by the NP population (General NP, whiplash, interventional, headache and risk for vertebral insufficiency) and type of clinical aim (diagnosis, prognosis, treatment, imaging). Each clinical NP population had a large overlap of clinical aims presented. The CPGs were directed to a variety of clinicians that included physicians, physiotherapists and chiropractors. Results suggest heterogeneity in CPG recommendations within each clinical aim. CPG characteristics accounting for these differences are outlined.

Conclusion: The majority of CPGs were developed for general NP that focused on treatment recommendations, with fewer number aimed at recommendations for diagnosis, prognosis, and outcomes. Heterogeneity of recommendations within the categories were noted as were potential factors associated with these differences, including CPG quality as assessed by the AGREE II.

Keywords: Clinical practice guidelines; Neck pain populations; Systematic review.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Consensus
  • Diagnostic Imaging / standards*
  • Humans
  • Neck Pain / diagnosis*
  • Neck Pain / epidemiology
  • Neck Pain / therapy*
  • Pain Management / standards*
  • Pain Measurement / standards*
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic / standards*
  • Practice Patterns, Physicians' / standards
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Risk Factors
  • Treatment Outcome

Grants and funding